Rationalism both explains a problem and a predicament. The problem is that by example it proffers the solution to the difference in architecture where it functions as a mathematical acknowledgement to embellish the development of mankind such that it is easily understandable to an unobstructed vision. The predicament it explains is two fold, firstly the problem of an architectural illumination is challenged by the consensus of society as they are secure by the knowledge of mystery and secondly the plight of constructing a ubiquitous and generic resolution to the crisis embedded in architecture takes such fright that the notion of power usurps any attempt at this form of revolution.

The Day before Tomorrow

In an effort to explain the issue of rational inquiry the notion of style takes a back seat in architecture; it takes the resolve of the undercurrent in political philosophy and simplifies the resounding success of the garden to manufacture its presence; to illuminate the need of a style that requires no author; to make architecture ubiquitous as its classical predecessor; to rewrite the law in the justification of an architectural resolution; to be able to live again.